|
search
international
home English
contact: info@safer-world.org
| |
Dear subscribers,
I thank again all who sent me information, and who mailed me information about a broken
link. www.safer-world.org
grows with your help and your support.
When you want to unsubscribe this newsletter, please send me an email.
We all cross
our fingers that there will be some success in Johannesburg.
Best wishes and good health
Ingrid Scherrmann
Fuchsfeldstr. 50, D-88416 Ochsenhausen
phone: + 49 7352 940529, fax: + 49 7352 4392
email: info@safer-world.org, web: http://www.safer-world.org
SAFER WORLD is a private independent international internet-network for a safer environment.
===================================================
AKTIV
"Bid to stop pine beetle pesticide lost" http://www.canada.com/search/site/story.asp?id=5A47D23B-F8B4-4433-ADD6-71244EBBA361
---
From P A N U P S, Pesticide Action Network Updates Service
Action Alert: Support Philippine Activists
August 26, 2002 This June, Philippine health activists Dr. Romy Quijano and his daughter,
journalist Ilang-Ilang Quijano learned they were being sued for libel--for the second
time--by Lapanday Agricultural Company (LADECO) for their exposé of pesticide poisonings
in Kamukhaan in the Philippines. Pesticide Action Network Philippines has launched an
international signature campaign to urge LADECO owner (and political adviser to the
President of the Philippines) Luis "Cito" Lorenzo Jr., to withdraw the suit.
Two years ago the Quijano's article "Poisoned Lives" was published in the
Philippine Daily Inquirer and Philippine Post newspapers, reporting the tragic story of an
entire village poisoned by persistent aerial and ground spraying on the adjacent banana
plantation (see PANNA's Global Pesticide Campaigner, December 1999). The Quijanos wrote of
villagers with skin problems, headaches, coughing, all classic symptoms of pesticide
poisoning. They also found several deaths attributable to the pesticides used on the
LADECO plantation since the early 1980s. Dr. Quijano and llang-llang made several tours of
the village along with a peasant organization in Digos, Davao del Sur, and obtained
testimony from some of the 150 families. They also found that spraying of hazardous
pesticide products including Dithane, Baycor, Furadan, Decis, Nemacur and Gramoxone had
polluted the soil and the sea, killing trees, crops, animals and fish, and destroying the
livelihood of farmers and fishermen over the years. Workers on the plantation also
reported being paid very low wages and being subjected to hazardous working conditions.
In August of 2000 the company responded with a libel suit against the authors for 20
million Philippine pesos. That case was eventually dismissed, but LADECO has now filed
another suit, this time for 5.5 million Philippine pesos, that relies on old claims
already declared by the court to be insubstantial. LADECO has also filed a motion to cite
the Quijanos for contempt, demanding that PAN Asia and the Pacific Regional Center remove
an article about the Kamukhaan poisonings from their website. According to Dr. Quijano,
the new suit "is clearly nothing but part of the harassment LADECO has been
continuously inflicting on us and the villagers of Kamukhaan."
Dr. Quijano also states that LADECO coerced villagers to sign retractions of statements
made in the 1997 study and recorded on videotape. He further states that LADECO conducted
inappropriate laboratory tests capable of detecting only a single pesticide that was not
among those named in his findings.
Dr. Quijano's study of Kamukhaan was first published internationally in 1997 and has
become influential testimony for the restriction of certain pesticides and the promotion
of safer and more equitable agricultural policies. In 1993, a transnational pesticide
manufacturer, Hoechst, also filed a 22 million Philippine pesos suit against Dr. Quijano
in response to statements made in a public lecture about health hazards of Endosulfan, a
Hoechst product. After attracting much local and international attention, the case was
dismissed and the Philippines government eventually banned further use of this product in
the country.
Dr. Quijano is a Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology at the College of Medicine,
University of the Philippines Manila, is president of Pesticide Action Network Philippines
and co-chairman of the International POPs Elimination Network. Ilang-Ilang Quijano is a
journalist in the Philippines.
As Ilang-Ilang Quijano states in a recent update and appeal for international support,
"This is a concrete case, among many others around the world, where pesticides have
been proven to destroy both people and nature. Without resistance, those who hold clout in
both business and politics can easily suppress this hard proof and evade
accountability."
ACTION: Send your e-mail or faxed endorsement (see sample letter at http://www.panna.org/billboard/billboard_020826.dv.html)
asking LADECO to withdraw and the Regional Court to dismiss the suit against the Quijanos
(IMPORTANT-include your name, address and organization) to: Ilang-Ilang Quijano, Pesticide
Action Network Philippines; email ilangq@yahoo.com; fax (63-2) 8050585.
Send a copy to PAN Asia and the Pacific; email panap@panap.net; fax (60-4) 657 7445; Web
site http://www.panap.net.
Contact: llang-llang Quijano; email ilangq@yahoo.com; Atty. Marie Yuviengco, Public
Interest Law Center; email pilc@skyinet.net; phone (63-2) 8993439; fax (63-2) 8993416.
Sources: PAN AP Web site http://www.panap.net;
"Kamukhaan: A Village Poisoned," Global Pesticide Campaigner, December 1999,
PANNA.
PANUPS is a weekly email news service providing resource guides and reporting on pesticide
issues that don't always get coverage by the mainstream media. It's produced by Pesticide
Action Network North America, a non-profit and non-governmental organization working to
advance sustainable alternatives to pesticides worldwide.
Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA), 49 Powell St., Suite 500, San Francisco,
CA 94102 USA, Phone: (415) 981-1771, Fax: (415) 981-1991 Email: panna@panna.org Web: http://www.panna.org
=====================================================
CHEMICALS - ARSENIC
Autoimmunity by pesticides: a critical review of the state of the science. Fri, 23
Aug 2002, Toxicol Lett 2002 Feb 28;127(1-3):101-9 Autoimmunity by pesticides: a critical review of the
state of the science. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgicmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12052647&dopt=Abstract
Website about ccawood http://www.noccawood.ca
===================================================
CHEMICALS - ENDOCRINE
DISRUPTING CHEMICALS (EDCs)
Chemical-related damage to wildlife support fears for human health
Washington, D.C. -- World Wildlife Fund is calling for stricter controls on dangerous hormone-disrupting chemicals after a new
report for the World Health Organization (WHO) and
other United Nation agencies concludes that damage
to wildlife substantiates concerns for human health. The WHO report, "Global Assessment of the State-of-the-Science of
Endocrine Disruptors," recognizes the strong
plausibility that adverse trends in human health are linked
to these chemicals.
Many common household products like electrical goods, plastic food and drink containers, cleaning compounds, cosmetics, and perfumes
contain endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that
interfere with the function of the body's naturally
occurring hormones. These substances disrupt reproductive and early developmental processes--particularly in offspring
exposed in the womb or in the egg.
Since the 1970s, incidence of childhood cancers, learning disabilities, autism, diabetes, early puberty, and abnormal penile
development has increased substantially. At
the same time, evidence linking these disorders with
exposure to hormone disrupting chemicals has continued to mount. The WHO report acknowledges that the changes in human health
trends in some areas are sufficient to warrant
concern and make this area a high research priority.
The WHO report details a variety of effects in wildlife which have been linked to exposure to chemicals with hormone disrupting properties--including imposex in mollusk species (e.g.
where female whelk grow penises), intersex in fish
(where males produce eggs or ovarian tissue in the
testis), reduced phallus size in male alligators, behavioral problems in birds, and compromised immune and reproductive
systems in mammals.
WWF is urging governments to take a precautionary approach to EDCs as evidence of effects are often measurable long before a
direct cause and effect is established. For
example, there was a raft of evidence linking cigarette
smoke to cancer decades before a causal mechanism was put forward. Similarly, action was taken against DDT before
scientists could prove how the pesticide caused
eggshell thinning in birds.
"WWF and WHO's expert panel agree that there is ample evidence of the chemical threats to wildlife and the worrisome links to
human health effects, " said Dr. Theo Colborn,
director of WWF's Wildlife and Contaminants
Program. "We owe it to our children and to wildlife to act now to eliminate exposure to synthetic hormone disrupting
chemicals."
WWF's critique of the WHO report is available at: http://www.wwfus.org/toxics/whatsnew/index.htm
The WHO report is available at: http://www.who.int/pcs/pcs_new.html
===================================================
CHEMICAL - GENDER-BENDING
CHEMICALS
Alarm at gender-bending chemicals By Lorna Duckworth Health Correspondent 12
August 2002 The World Health Organisation will urge governments today to establish an
immediate inquiry into the effects of gender-bending chemicals on human and animal
populations. Strong evidence links reproductive abnormalities and population declines in
some species of birds, fish, reptiles and amphibians with the chemicals, known as hormone
disruptors or EDCs (endocrine-disrupting chemicals). But concerns are also being raised
that EDCs have contributed to the increase in breast, testicular and prostate cancers
among humans and a decline in sperm counts. In response to the threat, the WHO will
publish a report today, written by a team of scientists, calling for an international
programme of research. The report details a large body of evidence pointing to the way
wildlife has been harmed by exposure to EDCs, including industrial chemicals such as
phthalates, alkylphenols, dioxins and PCBs, as well as herbicides, insecticides and
fungicides. But evidence that human health has been damaged by EDCs remains weak - largely
because of the lack of sufficiently robust studies, the report is expected to say. This
means that the effects on adults of low-level exposure to EDCs over a long period of time,
and the impact on unborn babies and young children, are poorly understood. But the WHO is
expected to conclude that recent health trends are sufficient to warrant concern. Concerns
have been raised about a decline in human sperm quality in several countries, the
increased incidence of a congenital malformation of the penis called hypospadias, and a
trend towards earlier puberty. Increases in the incidence of cancer in hormonally
sensitive tissues such as the breast, testes and prostate have also led to suggestions
that environmental chemicals could be involved. Bu!
t no studies have established a link. Wildlife studies have, however, shown a link between
exposure to hormone disruptors and changes in physiology, sexual behaviour and fertility.
Female fish downstream from pulp and paper mills have developed male sex organs and try to
mate with other females. After a chemical leak in Lake Apoka, Florida, male alligators
developed abnormal hormone levels, small penises and feminised gonads that diminished
their reproductive success. And fish-eating birds, including gulls and terns, have in the
past few decades given birth to an excess of female chicks and chicks with birth defects.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_medical/story.jsp?dir=505&story=323629&host=3&printable=1
===================================================
CHILDREN's EDUCATION
From P A N U P S, Pesticide Action Network Updates Service
Resource Pointer #288 (Children's Education)
August 14, 2002 For copies of the following resources, please contact the appropriate
publishers or organizations directly.
*Who Wants to be an IPM Super Sleuth? 2001* Web site. http://www.ipminstitute.org/supersleuth.htm.
IPM Institute of North America. An on-line, interactive web site including quizes,
crossword puzzles, word searches, matching and other fun games for elementary grade
students. Focuses on educating children about integrated pest management (IPM) solutions
for pests in and around the home. Includes an extensive list of IPM educational resources.
114 pages. Download free print-version at http://www.ipminstitute.org/supersleuth.htm.
Contact IPM Institute of North America, Inc., 1914 Rowley Ave., Madison WI 53726; phone
(608) 232-1528; fax (608) 232-1530; email ipmworks@ipminstitute.org; Web site http://www.ipminstitute.org.
*Exploring Urban Integrated Management: Activities and Resources for Teaching K-6, 2001*
Erica Jenkins, Michigan State University Pesticide Education Program. Curriculum guide for
teaching school and community IPM. Includes teacher fact sheets, lesson plans, and student
worksheets on topics including IPM steps and decision-making, insect and rodent pests,
inspections, and control method choices. 76 pages. Download free at http://www.pested.msu.edu/CommunitySchoolIpm/curriculum.htm.
Contact Community and School IPM, Michigan State University Pesticide Education Program,
B18 Food Safety and Toxicology Building, East Lansing, MI 48824; email
jenkinse@msue.msu.edu; Web site http://www.pested.msu.edu/.
*Environmental Health in Family Medicine: Curriculum for Teaching and Learning
Environmental Health, 2001* Writen by physicians and environmental health specialists for
health care professionals working with children and family medicine. Module topics cover
lead, indoor and outdoor air quality, pesticides, water quality and persistent organic
pollutants (POPS). 167 pages. Free. Download at
http://www.ijc.org/.
Also available on CD-ROM. Contact International Joint Commission, 234 Laurier Ave. W 22nd
Fl., Ottawa K1P 6K6, Canada; email houstonj@ottawa.ijc.org ; Web site
http://www.ijc.org/
*Join Our Pest Patrol, A Backyard Activity Book for Kids, 2000* Activity book and
companion teachers' guide includes many educational activities designed for 3rd and 4th
graders. Includes units on natural pest enemies, ecology, compost, caterpillars,
cockroaches, ticks, mosquitoes and weeds. 24 pages. Download free at http://www.mda.state.mn.us/IPM/IPMPubs.html.
Contact Integrated Pest Management Program, Agricultural Development Division, Minnesota
Department of Agriculture, 90 West Plato Boulevard, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55107; phone
(651) 297-3217; email jeanne.ciborowski@state.mn.us; Web site http://www.mda.state.mn.us/IPM/IPMPubs.html.
*Handbook of Pediatric Environmental Health, 2001* Ruth A. Etzel, ed. American Academy of
Pediatrics. Discusses preventable environmental hazards, including tobacco, ultraviolet
light, water pollution, pesticides, lead and mercury. Addresses issues such as nitrates in
water, asthma triggers and food contamination and identifies specific settings in which
children might be exposed to environmental hazards. Contact American Academy of
Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007-1098; phone (847)
434-4000, fax (847) 434-8000; email pubs@aap.org; Web site http://www.aap.org.
We encourage those interested in having resources listed in the PANUPS Resource Pointer to
send review copies of publications, videos or other resources to our office.
PANUPS is a weekly email news service providing resource guides and reporting on pesticide
issues that don't always get coverage by the mainstream media. It's produced by Pesticide
Action Network North America, a non-profit and non-governmental organization working to
advance sustainable alternatives to pesticides worldwide.
Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA), Email: panna@panna.org Web: http://www.panna.org
===================================================
CONGRESS
From: Asia Pacific Forum Of Environmental Journalists-HQ, August 08, 2002
Dear News Editors and ej's,
APFEJ HQ is soliciting your support to publish the
following news item on you print and electronic media publications.Thanks
a lot.
Cheers, APFEJ Congress Director.
World Environmental Congress To Convene in Sri
Lanka This Fall
The 14th World Congress of Environmental Journalists is expected to draw
100 participants from nearly 50 countries for its sessions in Colombo, the
capital of Sri Lanka, from October 27 to 31.
Participants are expected to include representatives of national
environmental journalists' organizations, environmental journalists, NGO
activists, government and United Nations officials, and media
professionals. The congress is organized by the Sri Lanka Environmental
Journalists Forum (SLEJF), the Commonwealth Environmental Journalists
Association (CEJA) and the Asia Pacific Forum of Environmental Journalists
(APFEJ).
The congress, which is supported by the United Nations Environment Program
(UNEP) and several development agencies, will deal with the role of media
concerning environment this century.
Journalists who plan to attend the event should submit a maximum 500-word
abstract in English. The theme for the abstract should deal with case
studies of media programs undertaken by government organizations,
non-governmental organizations and the private sector in developing
countries, particularly Asia-Pacific and the Commonwealth, on peace and the
environment. Papers from journalists, media NGOs and academia are
encouraged. The deadline for abstract submissions is August 31.
APFEJ is a world organization of professional environmental journalists
with over 8000 members from 91 countries. APFEJ programs include
specialized regional and international training workshops on environmental
reporting; publications, such as books on environmental reporting;
newsletters, and a clipping service.
For more information on the Congress please contact APFEJ
at P.O.Box 26, 434/3-Sri Jayawardenapura, Sri Lanka.
E-mail afej@sri.lanka.net
===================================================
COUNTRIES - EUROPE
Scientific Committee on Food
- Minutes of the 132nd Plenary Meeting of the Scientific Committee on
Food held on 15/16/17 April 2002 in Brussels http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/out132_en.pdf
- Opinion on the safety of n-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone residues in polyvinylpyrrolidone and
polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (insoluble polyvinylpyrrolidone) when used as food additives
(adopted by SCF on 30 May 2001) (updated) http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/out87_en.pdf
- Statement on a Report on 2alkylcyclobutanones (expressed on 2 July
2002) http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/out135_en.pdf
-Opinion on Food on quassin (expressed on 2 July 2002) http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/out134_en.pdf
- Opinion on pulegone and menthofuran (expressed on 2 July 2002) http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/scf/out133_en.pdf
and other topics.
===================================================
COUNTRIES - PHILIPPINES
From: MASIPAG, MGA MAGSASAKA AT SIYENTIPIKO PARA SA
PAGPAPAUNLAD NG AGHAM PANG-AGRIKULTURA (MASIPAG)Monday, August 26, 2002 Masipag Statement on Farmers Rights
Adopted at the Workshop, Defend Farmers Rights From Threats of
the Philippine Plant Variety Protection Act
2002, Dona Jovita Resort, 2-4th August 2002. (see also under AKTIV)
Collectively, farmers share the social responsibility to feed
society. For generations, they have nurtured
and bred our food crops, and have conserved
and improved the genetic resources that form the basis of food and agriculture. With farmers responsibility to
feed society, and stemming from their
enormous contribution, comes farmers rights.
Farmers have rights over their innovations, practices, knowledge, technologies and biological resources evolved through
generations, over
the factors and processes of production (land, capital, technology, inputs), and over legal and political decisions that
undermine their ability to produce food and
conserve genetic resources. The seeds, food,
animals and associated knowledge that farmers have conserved
and developed are not the product of any single farmer but are the collective products of many farming communities
through many generations. Farmers rights are
thus collective rights and farmers are not
owners, but stewards, of our biodiversity and genetic resources.
Farmers must be free to produce food, and must be appreciated, recognized, protected and strengthened in their work by
their inalienable and inviolable rights
relating to seeds, production, biodiversity
and genetic resources, politics and decision-making,
culture and knowledge, land, information and research, and sociopolitical factors as follows:
With respect to LAND farmers have the right to:
- Own land;
- Swift and just land redistribution programs;
- To use abandoned and unproductive lands (both public and private)
for the purposes of food production.
With respect to SEEDS AND GENETIC RESOURCES, recognizing that seeds
are the life of the farmer, farmers have the
right to:
- Use, save, exchange, multiply, sell and improve their genetic resources;
- Control seeds and planting materials including the right to refuse access to the seeds and knowledge where such access will
be detrimental to farmers rights (such as to
transnational corporations and
international research institutions as appropriate);
- Access seeds and genetic resources appropriate to their local environment and to the capacity and needs of farmers in
their communities;
- Freely choose what seeds, plants and animals to use on his/her farm.
In PRODUCTION farmers have the right to:
- Appropriate technologies which are simple, practical and
inexpensive and do not harm the environment
or human health;
- Abundant and safe water systems;
- Prevent technologies, policies, programs and institutions that
have the potential to destroy the resource
base of farming, including the land, the
water, the air, and seeds;
- Control the products of the harvest and the benefits of production including marketing and distribution;
- A fair price for their products.
On BIODIVERSITY farmers have the right to:
- Conserve and protect biodiversity and genetic resources including
on and off-farm biodiversity and watersheds
which are an integral part of farming
systems;
- Prevent technologies, policies and institutions that destroy the watershed and otherwise negatively impact on the ability
of farmers to produce food and conserve
biodiversity (e.g. logging, mining, and chemical
based farming).
In POLITICS AND DECISION-MAKING farmers have the right to:
- Join, support and form institutions that protect the rights of farmers;
- Meaningful participation in formulating policies, laws and
programs that affect farmers lives on
local, national and international levels;
- Block laws, policies, programs and institutions that are
contradictory to sustainable agriculture or
farmers rights;
- Government subsidies and support in agriculture including improved traditional varieties and indigenous resources.
On CULTURE AND KNOWLEDGE farmers have the right to:
- Control and use their own traditional knowledge free from the
threat of biopiracy;
- Freely express their local culture and knowledge, and to pass it on
to future generations;
- Respect for their way of life, their farming practices and their knowledge;
- Live in a world free of privatized intellectual property rights.
In INFORMATION AND RESEARCH farmers have the right to:
- Independent and balanced information about seeds and agriculture
in order to make informed choices;
- Truth in advertising including the right not to be bombarded with misleading or exaggerated statements designed to promote
certain varieties of seeds for profit;
- Updated, independent and balanced information on issues that
affect farmers rights;
- Undertake their own research and develop innovation;
- Provide direction for agricultural research.
In the SOCIOPOLITICAL area farmers have the right to:
- Organize and join organizations to protect and promote their rights;
- Promote sustainable agriculture and ecologically abundant agriculture;
- Live in a community that is peaceful and decent;
- Access safe and healthy food;
- A dignified and meaningful life;
- A viable and sustainable livelihood.
These rights aim to safeguard farmers against the negative effects of globalization including the excessive power and
influence of transnational corporations.
Farmers rights implicitly reject intellectual
property rights and genetic engineering which compromise farmers ability to produce food and to fulfill
their obligations as stewards of genetic
resources. Privatization of genetic resources clashes
with the very essence of farmers rights which implies collective rights and
responsibilities. We call on governments and institutions to recognize and implement
these rights at local, regional, national and international levels. Farmers have the right
and duty to defend themselves, their knowledge, the land and genetic resources against any
threat in whatever form it may take. Food security is only possible if we allow farmers to
freely grow food and protect agrobiodiversity as has been their right and responsibility
for generations. Recognition and implementation of farmers rights is essential not only to
protect farmers in the present but in order to ensure the continuity of activities that
are crucial for humanity at large.
[MASIPAG - Farmer Scientist Partnership for Development], MASIPAG, Farmers Fields, PHILIPPINES
===================================================
GM CROP
From: CBGnetwork, August 26th, Bayer in GM Crop Contamination Scandals
On 15th August it emerged that Bayer's new agricultural wing, Bayer CropScience
(1), was responsible for the illegal planting of genetically modified (GM) oil seed rape
(OSR) contaminated with an unauthorised GM crop line in field trials across the UK.
GM seed, planted at more than 20 farm scale trial sites in the UK since 1999, was
contaminated with substantial quantities (up to 2.8%) of an unauthorised variety of GM
OSR. The contaminating variety (also owned by Bayer), contains genes giving resistance to
the antibiotics neomycin and kanamycin. The implications of this are potentially serious.
Scientists have expressed concern that use of antibiotic resistance genes as marker genes
in food crops may lead to the proliferation of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Recent
studies suggest that it is possible for modified DNA from GM crops to be taken up by
bacteria in the human gut. Both neomycin and kanamycin are still used in the treatment of
a number of potentially fatal diseases.
The whole contamination incident has once again illustrated that it is impossible to
contain GM crops once they are released into the environment. The problem is particularly
acute with GM OSR as it spreads its pollen over a wide area contaminating other OSR crops
(2). This problem is especially serious in areas like northwestern Europe where OSR has
many wild relatives, and the risks of GM crop traits escaping into the eco-system are
therefore increased.
The case also shows the lack of regulatory controls surrounding the UK GM farm scale
trials. Effectively it was left up to Bayer/Aventis to ensure the purity of the seed that
they were using in trials. The contamination went unnoticed for 3 years by both Bayer and
the UK regulatory authorities. The seed contamination was eventually discovered by the
Scottish Agricultural College, in a trial they were conducting on behalf of Bayer
CropScience.
It is interesting to note that although the contamination was initially reported to
Bayer/Aventis on June 21st, it took almost two months for the story to be made public. It
was then made public at the height of the holiday period, traditionally the best time to
make a potentially disclosure. All of this adds to the feeling that these trials are a
sham and that the UK government is colluding with the powerful biotech lobby.
Varieties of GM OSR similar to those found to be contaminated in the UK have also been
grown in field trials in Belgium, France and Germany in recent years. However, the extent
of the use of contaminated seed in Bayer crop trials in the rest of Europe remains
unclear.
News of the contamination has caused an outcry in the UK. There have been widespread calls
for the suspension of the last round of the winter OSR farm scale trials. These trials are
due to be planted within the next few weeks. At present it seems unlikely that any
'suspension' resulting in the cancellation of these trials will occur. Any delays would
set back the Farm Scale Trial process by a year and throw government and industry plans
for GM crop commercialisation in the UK into turmoil.
It is possible that Bayer CropScience may even face criminal proceedings for failing to
prevent the contamination. Unconvinced that any legal action taken against Bayer would
result in the corporation being held accountable for its illegal activities, around 50
people partially decontaminated a Bayer OSR test site near Hilton in Dorset on August
18th. However, pulling up illegal GM crops was deemed to be more illegal than growing them
in the first place and 14 people were arrested for criminal damage to the crop.
Meanwhile Bayer CropScience, the company who are now responsible for the mess, is doing a
good job of hiding behind its old identity Aventis CropScience. Thus far Bayer's public
image has remained fairly unscathed, ensuring that all negative publicity is directed
towards Aventis, a company that no longer has any involvement in GM crops. Despite having
become part of the new Bayer CropScience in early June, Aventis CropScience Ltd is not due
to change its name until the autumn. Signs and flags at old Aventis CropScience factories
and offices, as well as official letters all still bear the Aventis name, and when you
ring them, the voice on the end of the phone still answers "Hello, Aventis".
(1) Bayer CropScience was launched on 4th June 2002 following Bayer AG's 7.25 billion euro
purchase of Aventis CropScience.
(2) For example in Canada where GM oil seed rape/Canola has been grown for several years
there have been several well publicised cases of organic/non-GM farmers having their
contaminated with pollen from GM crops on neighbouring farms. Both Bayer (Aventis
CropScience) and Monsanto are currently being sued for damages by Canadian organic farmers
(see below)
Organic farmers gain key piece of evidence in class action
http://www.saskorganic.com/
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada publicly released a study
today on the Isolation Effectiveness in Canola Seed Production. The study discloses that
growers producing Certified canola seed for the conventional canola market cannot prevent
genetic contamination of their seed by Monsanto's Roundup Ready Canola and Aventis's
Liberty Link genetically modified (GM) canolas. The contamination was so severe that the
research scientists who did the study recomended that four varieties of canola seed sold
in the conventional canola market be withdrawn or Breeder and Foundation seed sources for
the varieties be cleaned up.
In 2000-2001 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC) undertook a study for the Canadian
Seed Growers Association (CSGA) to look at whether the isolation distances used by
certified seed growers were effective in preventing genetic contamination by Round Up
Ready and Liberty Link GM canola varieties. It took months of pressure on behalf of the
Saskatchewan certified organic farmers engaged in a class action lawsuit against Monsanto
and Aventis to obtain a copy of this important publicly-funded study.
Results show that even with the strict isolation distance and inspection standards
required by certified seed growers, contamination occurs. In the case of one very
experienced grower mentioned in the study, the contamination level was as high as 7.20%.
This unusually high level of contamination led the researchers to conclude that the
foundation seed itself was highly contaminated.
Seventeen of the 70 samples tested showed contamination that exceedee the purity required
for Certified seed (99.75%) and 30 of the 70 samples exceeded the purity required for
Foundation seed (99.95%). Only two of the 70 samples would be considered acceptable seed
for organic production. The study concluded that "... the present isolation distance
of 100m provides adequate but not complete protection from foreign pollen." And
further, that the "... large number of canola seeds normally planted per acre plus
the high probability that a small percentage of herbicide tolerant seeds will be present
in most Certified seed lots has and will continue to result in significant herbicide
tolerant plant populations in most commercial canola fields."
It follows that certified organic farmers, whose standards strictly prohibit contamination
by GM varieties, are highly unlikely to be able to produce a crop free of RoundUp Ready or
Liberty Link contamination, thus losing the opportunity to serve the lucrative certified
organic canola market.
The CSGA maintains that the study was merely preliminary and not statistically
significant. However, the research scientists who did the study do not say this.
Furthermore, they state that the sample size was large enough to give a 99% confidence
level that buyers would find the same level of contamination in the seed stocks.
AAFC and the CSGA initially refused to release the study when asked. After persistent
pressure, AAFC finally agreed to release a copy of what it was already planning to release
to the CBC pursuant to an existing Access to Information request. However when the
document finally arrived, large tracts were missing and relevant portions were concealed
as "confidential business information". It was only after the lawyer
representing the organic farmers in the class action launched a court application to
compel the disclosure of the full report that the AAFC and CSGA offered to publicly
disclose the full report.
This study will be a key piece of evidence in the organic farmer's action because it
provides scientific documentation of the widespread GM contamination that has all but
wiped out their organic canola market. It further provides evidence that the contamination
is from both the Roundup Ready and Liberty Link genes.
Coalition against BAYER-dangers, www.CBGnetwork.org , CBGnetwork@aol.com
The Coalition against BAYER-dangers has been monitoring the BAYER Corporation for more
than 20 years. Anyone who has information on possibly illicit activities of BAYER - please
let us know.
===================================================
NUCLEAR
POWER AND WEAPONS
From REHN, RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT &
HEALTH NEWS #749
(free subscription, send E-mail to listserv@lists.rachel.org with the words "Subscribe rachel-news your full name in the
message)
August 8, 2002 Our nuclear Achilles
Heel
After 60 years of experience with nuclear power and weapons, it now seems clear that humans are unable to devise
controls that work. Nuclear is too complicated and
unpredictable for reliable human control. Unlike renewable sources of energy, nuclear is an unforgiving technology because normal human lapses and
errors can produce unexpected consequences that are
catastrophic and irreversible. Yet as a nation, our
tax dollars are still massively subsidizing the
expansion of nuclear.[1] Furthermore our taxes are
subsidizing the deployment of even newer technologies
that are far more complicated than nuclear, less predictable,
and therefore likely to plague our children with endless
trouble, namely biotech and nanotech.[2] ... more at www.rachel.org
===================================================
SHORT INFORMATION
Independent Media Platform for the WSSD/Rio+10/Johannesburg
Summit 2002 Joburg Media Project http://joburgmedia.net
31 July, 2002 Hairdressing
salon chemical alert Hairdressers are more
likely to give birth to babies with major physical defects,
a study suggests.Researchers in Sweden have also found that women who work in hairdressing salons have a slightly increased risk of
having small babies, compared with the general
population. The scientists suggest that the
chemicals used to style hair, including colours
and hairspray, could be responsible. More at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2162508.stm
GM crop-testing suspended. Ministers suspend GM crop-testing By Paul Kelbie and Marie Woolf , The
Independent, 16 August 2002 . The Government's
controversial GM crop-testing programme was thrown into disarray yesterday after it
emerged that a number of fields had been contaminated with unauthorised seeds since the
trials began three years ago. ... (More when you send me a private mail I can send you he whole article.)
Sleep apnea and occupational exposure to solvents
Heiskel H, Gunzenhäuser D, Seidler A, Volk S, Pflug B, Kauppinen T, Elsner G http://www.occuphealth.fi/e/dept/sjweh/current.htm
The Westward March of West Nile , August 16, 2002
http://www.panna.org
What's new on CBR's environmental estrogens and other hormones
web site
Environmental Estrogens and Other Hormones Web Site http://www.som.tulane.edu/ecme/eehome/
Center for Bioenvironmental Research at Tulane and Xavier Universities http://www.cbr.tulane.edu
Environmental Hormone 2002 Conference October 17-19, New
Orleans, LA http://e.hormone.tulane.edu
==================================================
end of newsletter/10/08/27/2002 of SAFER
WORLD
|