|
SAFER WORLD a private independent international internet information network www.safer-world.org/ 33-12/17/2004 |
|
contact: info@safer-world.org
|
|
TAKE ACTION From: The Safe Cosmetics Action Center. ( www.SafeCosmetics.org ) You can take action online to urge U.S. companies to remove chemicals linked to cancer, birth defects and other harms from the health and beauty products you use everyday: http://action.SafeCosmetics.org. *** From P A N U P S Pesticide Action Network Updates Service Stop EPA From Testing Pesticides on Children December 1, 2004 Children's advocates were stunned in early November as the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a new study of pesticide impacts on children that planned to offer money and camcorders to families for exposing their infants and toddlers to pesticides. After a chorus of opposition, EPA postponed, but didn't cancel the industry funded Children's Environmental Exposure Research Study (CHEERS) in Duval County, Florida. Sign our petition urging EPA to cancel the study, return the money, and give parents the facts about the serious health risks that pesticides pose to children. The testing of pesticides on infants and children has clear ethical implications. Scientific evidence clearly suggests that children in homes where home and garden pesticides are used are more likely to develop serious diseases, including asthma and childhood cancers. A recent study reports children with early persistent asthma were 10 times more likely to have been exposed to herbicides and insecticides in their first year. Children under five who live in homes where pesticides are applied may face a risk of childhood leukemia 11 times greater than those who live where no pesticides are applied. Home use of insecticide foggers has been associated with a risk of brain tumors in children that is more than 10 times higher. As more organophosphorus (OP) insecticides are being replaced with pyrethroids-many of which are endocrine disrupting compounds-new adverse effects are likely to surface. Exposure to neurotoxic pesticides, including OPs and pyrethroids, is suspected as a possible cause of learning disabilities such as Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder/Attention Deficit Disorder, conditions that have reached epidemic proportions in the U.S. While the epidemiological data are not in yet, animal models suggest there is reason for concern. The CHEERS project was criticized for its offers of cash rewards and camcorders to families that regularly spray pesticides in their home. Although the website for the study promises, "EPA will not ask parents to apply pesticides in their home to be a part of this study" the offering of prizes may encourage families unaccustomed to using pesticides in the home to change their habits to become eligible. The clinics and hospitals selected as recruitment sites in Duvall County predominantly serve low-income communities and serve a greater proportion of African Americans than the rest of the county, thus the children from low income communities of color are likely to bear the greatest risks in this EPA-led study. EPA plans to accept $2.1 million from the American Chemistry Council (ACC) to fund this ethically questionable study. Instead of allowing the pesticide industry to direct its research priorities, the agency should be doing all it can to prevent children's exposure to toxic pesticides. EPA should be informing parents of the risks of home pesticide use and promoting alternatives. Instead it has chosen collaboration with the industry that produces these chemicals to see how much exposure is "acceptable." Sign our petition asking EPA to firmly and permanently back away from the CHEERS study, and begin speaking the truth to parents about pesticide risks. See the petition at, http://www.petitiononline.com/NoCheers/. Sources: EPA CHEERS website: http://www.epa.gov/cheers; Buckley, J.D., L.L. Robinson, R. Swotinsky, et al. 1989, Occupational exposures of parents of children with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: A report from the Children's Cancer Study Group, Cancer Research 49: 4030–37; Lowengart, R.A., J.M. Peters, C. Cicioni, et al. 1987. Childhood leukemia and parents' occupational and home exposures, Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 79(1): 39-46; Pogoda, J.M. and S. Preston-Martin. 1997. Household pesticides and risk of pediatric brain tumors, Environmental Health Perspectives, 105(11): 1214–20. PANUPS is a weekly email news service providing resource guides and reporting on pesticide issues that don't always get coverage by the mainstream media. It's produced by Pesticide Action Network North America, a non-profit and non-governmental organization working to advance sustainable alternatives to pesticides worldwide.
Back issues of PANUPS are available online at:
http://www.panna.org/resources/panups.html
To comment, send an email to:
panna@panna.org
To subscribe, send a blank email to:
PANUPS-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com
*** WORLD~WIDE TOXIC INJURY PROCLAMATION
http://www.mcsbeaconofhope.com/proc2005.html CHEMICAL - ARSENIC From Deborah Barrie: Arsenic articles and news Arsenic sequestration by ferric iron plaque on cattail roots. NK Blute, DJ Brabander, HF Hemond, SR Sutton, MG Newville, and ML Rivers. Environ Sci Technol, 2004; 38(22): 6074-7. http://highwire.stanford.edu/cgi/medline/pmid;15573609 Arsenic removal from groundwater by a newly developed adsorbent. H Takanashi, A Tanaka, T Nakajima, and A Ohki. Water Sci Technol, 2004; 50(8): 23-32. http://highwire.stanford.edu/cgi/medline/pmid;15566183 Contamination of Water Sources. Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Rajya Sabha, December 07, 2004 http://pib.nic.in/release/release.asp?relid=5392 Testing innovative ways to treat arsenic-contaminated water Medical News Today, 8 Dec 2004 http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=17479 Deborah Elaine Barrie, deborahbarrie@hotmail.com http://www.noccawood.ca
================================================= Public health- Risk Assessment: Scientific Committee on Consumer Products:- Questions: "Request for a scientific opinion: the potential skin sensitisation risks associated with the release of 2-mercaprobenzothiazole (MBT) from natural rubber soothers, teats and consumer products" http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_q_014.pdf "Request for a scientific opinion: Submission II on Benzoic acid, its salts and esters" http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_q_015.pdf "Request for a scientific opinion: Safety review of Triclocarban (N-(4-chlorophenyl)-N?-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)urea) for other uses than as a preservative" http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_q_016.pdf "Request for a scientific opinion: Safety evaluation of Ethyl lauroyl arginate HCl for its use in cosmetic products" http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_q_017.pdf "Request for a scientific opinion: Tea Tree oil" http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_q_018.pdf "Request for a scientific opinion: Safety evaluation of parabens (4-Hydroxybenzoic acid, its salts and esters)" http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_q_019.pdf "Request for a scientific opinion: Safety evaluation of Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) (CAS No. 556-67-2) ? INCI name CYCLOMETHICONE" http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_q_020.pdf "Request for a scientific opinion: Safety assessment of Bishydroxyethyl biscetyl malonamide (Questamide H)" http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_q_021.pdf "Request for a scientific opinion: Safety evaluation of hydrogen peroxide in tooth whitening products" http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_q_022.pdf "Request for a scientific opinion: Safety evaluation of GLYOXAL (CAS No 107-22-2)" http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_q_023.pdf "Request for a scientific opinion: Scientific opinion of the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment on the maximum concentration of fluorine compounds in children?s toothpastes" http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_q_024.pdf * Food Safety - GM Food & Feed - Questions & Answers Question and Answers on the Regulation of GMOs in the EU http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/food/biotechnology/gmfood/qanda_en.htm ***
From BEUC, The European Consumer's
Organization
Air fresheners & REACH - Foul-smelling whiff from air fresheners!, PR/023/2004
2004-11-22
================================================= CHEMICALS - PESTICIDES From P A N U P S Pesticide Action Network Updates Service U.S. Muscles Montreal Protocol on MB Limits December 10, 2004. U.S. methyl bromide (MB) consumption will increase in 2005, despite provisions added to the Montreal Protocol in 1997 to eliminate production and use of the fumigant in industrial nations by 2005. On November 29, 2004, in Prague, the 16th Conference of Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer approved the U.S. government’s request to increase exemptions for continued use of MB in so-called "critical uses." The exemption will increase the nation's consumption of this cancer causing and ozone-depleting chemical to 37% of the 1991 baseline level, or about 9,400 tons in 2005. That is more than the total amount used by all U.S. agricultural and other users in 2003. ... Sources: NRDC Fact Sheets, USDA Proposed Rules for "Official Quarantine Use, and Actual Data on Methyl Bromide Use in the U.S."; Non-chemical Alternatives to Methyl Bromide, Excerpts from Technical Literature, PANNA, Agricultural Pesticide Use May Be Associated With Increased Risk of Prostate Cancer, National Cancer Institute, Cancer.gov, http://www.nci.nih.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/AgricultureHealthStudy. * US Blocks Phase Out of Lindane in North America October 7, 2004 Last week, U.S. representatives parted company with Canada and Mexico and announced plans to allow continued use of the pesticide lindane that persists in air and water and has been found at high levels in the Artic. Canada plans to eliminate agricultural uses of lindane by the end of 2004 and Mexico plans a full phase out of agricultural, veterinary and pharmaceutical uses of the pesticide. Representatives from the three countries met in Montreal, Canada September 28-30, 2004 to draft a North American Regional Action Plan (NARAP) for lindane through the Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America established by the North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA). * PIC Lists 14 New Chemicals September 27, 2004 The 74 countries that signed and ratified the Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent (PIC treaty) added 14 of 15 proposed new chemicals to the treaty's international "watch" list. An early warning system for sharing information on banned and severely restricted pesticides and other chemicals, the PIC treaty held its first official Conference of Parties on September 20th in Geneva. The meeting was marred by controversy when Canada and Russia blocked the chrysotile form of asbestos from being added to the list.
Back issues of PANUPS are available online at:
http://www.panna.org/resources/panups.html
To comment, send an email to:
panna@panna.org
To subscribe, send a blank email to:
PANUPS-subscribe@topica.email-publisher.com
Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA), 49 Powell St., Suite 500, San
Francisco, CA 94102 USA, Email:
panna@panna.org
Web:
http://www.panna.org
================================================= ELECTRO-MAGNETICAL FIELDS From ISIS, The Institute of Science in Society 28/09/04 Researchers found "highly significant" evidence for damages
to brain cells in rats exposed for 2 hrs to microwaves from mobile phones; and
these damages were still seen 50 days after the exposure. Mobile phones undermine the blood-brain barrierLundt and colleagues have been studying the
effects of 915MHz radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in rats
since 1988. "In a series of more than 1,600 animals, we have proven that
subthermal power densities from both pulse- modulated and continuous RF EMFs -
including those from ...mobile phones - have the potency to significantly open
the blood-brain barrier such that the animal's own albumin passes out of the
bloodstream into the brain tissue and accumulates in the neurons and glial cells
surrounding the capillaries." Brain damage persists 50 days after exposureIn a study published in June 2003, Salford
and colleagues exposed rats to RF EMF in special transverse electromagnetic
transmission line chambers (TEM-cells) designed by scaling down previously
constructed cells at the National Bureau of Standards. These cells generate
uniform EMF s for standard measurements. A mobile phone with a programmable
power output was connected via a coaxial cable to the TEM-cell; and no voice
modulation was applied. The TEM-cell is enclosed in a wooden box (15x15x15 cm)
that supports the outer conduction and central plate. The outer conductor is
made of brass net and is attached to the inner walls of the box. The centre
plate, or septum, is made of aluminium. The TEM cells were placed in a
temperature-controlled room, where room air is circulated through holes in the
wooden box. Teenagers most affectedThe researchers pointed out that 12-26 week
old rats are comparable in age to human teenagers, the most frequent users of
mobile phones. This level of damage to the nerve cells is worrying, as "it may
result in reduced brain reserve capacity". In other words, the teenagers' brains
may age prematurely. A study by retail analysts Mintel found that up to 80% of
11 to 14 year-olds have a mobile phone in the United Kingdom. This article can be found on the I-SIS website at http://www.i-sis.org.uk/MPABD.php
Sources for this article are posted on ISIS members' website :
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/full/MPABDFull.php
The Institute of Science in Society, PO Box 32097, London NW1 OXR
General Enquiries sam@i-sis.org.uk - Website/Mailing List press-release@i-sis.org.uk - ISIS Director m.w.ho@i-sis.org.uk
Material in this email may be reproduced in
any form without permission, on condition that it is accredited accordingly
and contains a link to
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/
================================================= LAW
Canada Moves Closer to Being a Smokefree Country
To win smokefree air where you live, go to
http://www.smokefree.net/alerts.php
================================================= MEDIA Peace Media E-magazine ( www.peacejournalism.com ) is currently looking for freelance writers who are interested in writing articles dealing with various topics. Peace Media E-magazine welcomes editorial submissions from freelance writers. Varieties of writing styles are invited. More under http://peacejournalism.com/submittingArticles.asp ================================================= RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH NEWS From Peter Montague, December 2004 Dear Rachel's Reader, The chemical industry is mounting a major campaign against the precautionary principle. They have hired two attack-dog public relations firms, Nichols-Dezenhall, and Wirthlin WorldWide, to discredit precaution in the minds of the public. They started laying the ground work for this campaign four years ago, and now they are ramping up their attack. (For some eye-popping documentation, see http://www.rachel.org/library/getfile.cfm?ID=492 and http://www.rachel.org/library/getfile.cfm?ID=493.) They have developed a consistent "party line" that they are repeating at conferences, at public hearings, and in the media. They use consistent down-home language to make precaution seem foolish, unnecessary and dangerous. They have developed a series of stories that they tell to illustrate why precaution is a bad idea. Their favorite story is the one in which the Peruvian government hears that chlorine is dangerous. The Peruvians act on this knowledge -- they take "precautionary action" and stop chlorinating their water supply -- which causes several thousand deaths from cholera. I heard this story told almost two years face by a professor at Stanford University, and the same story told this summer by a professor at Rutgers, the state university of New Jersey. Neither of these esteemed scholars checked their facts before telling the story. If they had, they'd have found out the story was bogus and untrue -- a piece of fiction intended to scare people away from the precautionary principle. Now the anti-precaution campaign is gaining traction. Letters to the editor have begun to appear in newspaper across the country. In the most recent issues of Rachel's we analyzed some anti-precaution nonsense planted in the New York Times Nov. 21. Their plan is simple: they are attacking the precautionary principle itself as unnecessary and extremist; they are attacking the advocates of precaution as extremists and uninformed Chicken Littles; and they are claiming that "risk assessment" is totally precautionary. Not long ago, I heard a representative of the American Chemistry Council (formerly, the Chemical Manufacturers Association) tell an audience of 200 people that the chemical industry doesn't need the precautionary principle because it is already fully precautionary. So we've got our work cut out for us: ** We've got to debunk risk assessment and show how it has caused enormous harm to human health and the environment; ** We've got to catalog how the precautionary principle is being used by sensible people around the country and, indeed, around the world; ** We've got to develop common-sense, plain-language arguments of our own so people can write their own letters to the editor advocating precaution. ** We've got to continue to expose what the chemical industry is up to. As you know, that about sums up what we do here at Rachel's. But we need your help to keep doing this work, fighting for precaution. We've got to pay the light bill, keep the computers whirring, and pay our small, hard-working staff. Can you help us with a donation? To support our Rachel's work on the precautionary principle, please fill out the form below or make a contribution online at http://www.rachel.org (click on the "Donate Now" button in the upper right corner of the screen). Donate Now is a secure service provided by Groundspring.org. Yours sincerely, Peter Montague, Editor Comment Ingrid Scherrmann: For me Peter Montague is one of the best authors of the world to educate people about environemantal and health news. I hope very much that www.rachel.org can do his work also in the future. *** November 25, 2004 Living within Limits # 805 November 11, 2004 Precautionary Mister Rogers, Part 3* # 8ß4 October 28, 2004 Precautionary Mister Rogers, Part 2* # 803 October 14, 2004 Precautionary Mister Rogers, Part 1* # 802
September 30, 2004 The chemical wars, Final
Part # 801
by Peter Montague
Continuing: The current system of environmental regulation considers new
chemicals and new technologies "innocent until proven guilty." As a result,
the public must "prove harm" before alternatives will be considered. Such a
system requires large-scale harm to occur (to humans and ecosystems) before
anyone is asked to change their destructive behavior
To start your own free subscription to Rachel's, send a blank Email to:
join-rachel@gselist.org
================================================= SCIENCE
Karl-Rainer Fabig
Multiple chemical sensitivity seen from physiological and
genetic properties of human populations affected by chemical stress
The
presentation was given at the second day of the “Workshop of the
Thematic Network SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY” (www.sustainability-strategy.net
) "From sustainability science to sustainability governance
Proposals for an improvement of European sustainability strategy
elaboration and implementation"
which
was held from 01.-03.12.2004 in Roskilde and Copenhavn. http://www.safer-world.org/e/disease/MCS/fabig.htm
Or as a pdf-file when you send me an email
to
info@safer-world.org
***
Pregnant Women: Solvent Exposure Hurts Baby Kids Show Language, Attention, Dexterity, Hyperactivity Problems By Jeanie Lerche Davis WebMD Medical News Reviewed By Charlotte Grayson, MD on Monday, October 04, 2004 by Week Get Parenting & Pregnancy News in Your Inbox Oct. 4, 2004 -- Women working in nail salons, dry cleaning establishments, medical laboratories, and manufacturing plants listen up: Pregnant women who have on-the-job exposure to chemical solvents used with these types of jobs are putting their fetus' brain development at risk, new research shows. SOURCE: Laslo-Baker, D. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, October 2004; vol 158: pp 956-961. http://webcenter.health.webmd.netscape.com/content/article/94/103062.htm *** The December issue of Environmental Health Perspectives : http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2004/112-17/toc.html================================================= SPEECH Ingrid Scherrmann MCS (Multiple Chemical Sensitivity): Challenges for patients, medicine, politics and society
Speech at 14. November 2002, MCS, 1. Fachdialog,
Diplomatische Akademie Wien Organizer: seibersdorf research &
Bundesministerium
für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (Ministry for
agriculture, forestry, environment and water supply
You get the ppt as a pdf-file (in English) from the speech when
you send an email to
info@safer-world.org
Original in German: Ingrid Scherrmann Multiple
Chemical Sensitivity (MCS): Herausforderungen für Patient, Medizin, Politik
und Gesellschaft. Rede beim 1. Fachdialog zu MCS in Wien. (14. 11.
2002), veranstaltet vom Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft,
Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, von Seibersdorf Research, und mit Unterstützung
der AGU (AerztInnen für eine gesunde Umwelt), veroeffentlicht unter .
www.safer-world.org/d/Scherrmann/skript/herausforderungen.htm
=================================================
end of newslettter /English/33
Fair use notice
This site contains copyrighted
material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the
copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to
advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in
section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for
research and educational purposes. For more information go
to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
Ingrid Scherrmann
Fuchsfeldstr. 50, D-88416 Ochsenhausen, phone: + 49 7352 940529, fax: + 49 7352 4392 email: info@safer-world.org , Scherrmann@t-online.de Scherrmann@safer-world.org web: www.safer-world.org SAFER WORLD is a private independent international internet-network for a safer and healthy environment. |
Copyright© 1998-2008 SAFER WORLD. All rights reserved |